首页> 外文OA文献 >Another Modernity is Possible? : The Global Justice Movement and the Transformations of Politics
【2h】

Another Modernity is Possible? : The Global Justice Movement and the Transformations of Politics

机译:另一种现代性可能吗? :全球正义运动与政治变革

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using and expanding upon the conception of ‘successive modernities’ that has recently been developed within social theory, this article offers an interpretation of the political aims, ideas, and practices of the ‘global justice movement’ and argues that this contemporary social movement is best understood as an expression of the tensions characterizing the prevailing configuration of Western modernity in our own time. Social movements have often simultaneously challenged, changed, and sustained the institutions, norms, and habits of modern societies. Placing the global justice movement in this historical context, the author elaborates how the notion of the creative capacities of social movements has hitherto been discussed in several major theories about social movements and modernity. The article argues that the movements mobilized since the 1990s in response to issues related to globalization should neither be seen as revolts against the demise of ‘organized modernity’, nor as heralding a new type of Western modernity. Instead, the critique and political claims of the global justice movement are, according to the author, better interpreted as expressing a will to realize a ‘third modernity’ in an alternative way that stresses the values of participatory democracy, democratization of international economic institutions, and the strengthening of social equality on a global level. Thus, the movement should foremost be seen as articulating a crisis in the forms of politics and democracy during our present epoch of modernity.
机译:利用并扩展了最近在社会理论中发展起来的“成功现代性”的概念,本文对“全球正义运动”的政治目标,思想和实践进行了解释,并认为这种当代社会运动是最好的。它被理解为是我们时代以来西方现代主义盛行特征的紧张表现。社会运动经常同时挑战,改变和维持现代社会的制度,规范和习惯。作者将全球正义运动置于这种历史背景下,阐述了迄今为止如何在关于社会运动和现代性的几种主要理论中讨论了社会运动的创造能力的概念。文章认为,自1990年代以来为应对与全球化有关的问题而动员的运动既不应被视为对“有组织的现代性”消亡的反抗,也不应被视为预示着一种新型的西方现代性。相反,作者认为,对全球正义运动的批评和政治主张可以更好地解释为表达以另一种方式实现“第三现代性”的意愿,这种方式强调参与性民主的价值,国际经济制度的民主化,以及在全球范围内加强社会平等。因此,在我们当前的现代时代,该运动应被视为以政治和民主形式阐明危机。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wennerhag, Magnus;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:20:10

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号